Missoula County opposes SB 169: Generally revise voter ID laws up for hearing this afternoon in the Senate State Administration Committee. It is rare that the Election’s Office would need to work with a voter who would not have one of the first four IDs provided; however, asking a voter who does not have one of those four forms of ID may be a burden for some voters. Missoula County already has a process at the polls for a voter to challenge another voter if they do not believe that person is eligible. Missoula County does not believe that this change in voter ID laws is necessary to prevent fraud.
Missoula County opposes SB 169: Generally revise voter ID laws up for a second reading this afternoon on the Senate floor. It is rare that the Election’s Office would need to work with a voter who would not have one of the first four IDs provided; however, asking a voter who does not have one of those four forms of ID may be a burden for some voters. Missoula County already has a process at the polls for a voter to challenge another voter if they do not believe that person is eligible. Missoula County does not believe that this change in voter ID laws is necessary to prevent fraud.
Missoula County opposes SB 169: Generally revise voter ID laws up for hearing in the House State Administration Committee tomorrow morning. It is rare that the Election’s Office would need to work with a voter who would not have one of the first four IDs provided; however, asking a voter who does not have one of those four forms of ID may be a burden for some voters. Missoula County already has a process at the polls for a voter to challenge another voter if they do not believe that person is eligible. Missoula County does not believe that this change in voter ID laws is necessary to prevent fraud.
Missoula County continues to oppose SB 169: Generally revise voter ID laws up for second reading on the House floor this afternoon. It is rare that the Election’s Office would need to work with a voter who would not have one of the first four IDs provided; however, asking a voter who does not have one of those four forms of ID may be a burden for some voters. Missoula County already has a process at the polls for a voter to challenge another voter if they do not believe that person is eligible. Missoula County does not believe that this change in voter ID laws is necessary to prevent fraud.
Senator Bennett,
ReplyDeleteMissoula County opposes SB 169: Generally revise voter ID laws up for hearing this afternoon in the Senate State Administration Committee. It is rare that the Election’s Office would need to work with a voter who would not have one of the first four IDs provided; however, asking a voter who does not have one of those four forms of ID may be a burden for some voters. Missoula County already has a process at the polls for a voter to challenge another voter if they do not believe that person is eligible. Missoula County does not believe that this change in voter ID laws is necessary to prevent fraud.
Please oppose SB 169.
Senators,
ReplyDeleteMissoula County opposes SB 169: Generally revise voter ID laws up for a second reading this afternoon on the Senate floor. It is rare that the Election’s Office would need to work with a voter who would not have one of the first four IDs provided; however, asking a voter who does not have one of those four forms of ID may be a burden for some voters. Missoula County already has a process at the polls for a voter to challenge another voter if they do not believe that person is eligible. Missoula County does not believe that this change in voter ID laws is necessary to prevent fraud.
Please oppose SB 169.
Representative Whitman,
ReplyDeleteMissoula County opposes SB 169: Generally revise voter ID laws up for hearing in the House State Administration Committee tomorrow morning. It is rare that the Election’s Office would need to work with a voter who would not have one of the first four IDs provided; however, asking a voter who does not have one of those four forms of ID may be a burden for some voters. Missoula County already has a process at the polls for a voter to challenge another voter if they do not believe that person is eligible. Missoula County does not believe that this change in voter ID laws is necessary to prevent fraud.
Please oppose SB 169.
Representatives,
ReplyDeleteMissoula County continues to oppose SB 169: Generally revise voter ID laws up for second reading on the House floor this afternoon. It is rare that the Election’s Office would need to work with a voter who would not have one of the first four IDs provided; however, asking a voter who does not have one of those four forms of ID may be a burden for some voters. Missoula County already has a process at the polls for a voter to challenge another voter if they do not believe that person is eligible. Missoula County does not believe that this change in voter ID laws is necessary to prevent fraud.
Please oppose SB 169.